952
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] elscallr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's because you don't know what an "internet service provider" is. Twitter is not one.

[-] teft@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago

I know what ISP means. Read my edit.

[-] elscallr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Twitter isn't, and shouldn't be under any obligation to respond to you proxying your requests through their url tracker with any service level.

Is it unethical? Yeah. Does it violate the letter of proposed NN laws? No. Does it violate the spirit of proposed NN laws? Also no. Those laws don't cover what happens while a request is inside a parties network, only the traffic that travels in and out of it, of which Twitter was manipulating neither.

Well, I suppose they could deliver a few packets with a couple microseconds of latency when they delivered the HTTP response payload but they would have to literally modify their OS's TCP stack to do so and the entirety of that actual throttling would be literally milliseconds of difference.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
952 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS