718
submitted 4 months ago by ccunning@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

I'm brazillian and its not quite blocked yet, can access it as of this moment. It will take some time until all internet providers block twitter

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Can you tell us more about the motivations? Seems political more than anything specific musk is doing now that he wasnt doing before.

Im happy to see X go down in flames, but I also dont want citizens silenced if fascism is creeping in.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 months ago

Mostly because of how Xitter refused to block accounts accounts related to an insurrection at the Capitol, then ignored court orders.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

To be clear to usinites: that’s the Jan 8 Brazilian capitol uprising, staged a year later and in copy of the orange one.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

That judge claims the people he wants banned from the platform are anti democracy and what not, but musk refused to comply. Its a complicated subject and my opinion is just that, my own opinion. That judge (most of them in fact) believe themselves to be all mighty, they interpret the law as they see fit and use their supreme court orders to do as they wish, when their role should be only to act as the highest instance of law in the country. Just today he also froze starlink's account in the country to charge fines from the twitter issue, that is not exactly the correct way to go about it, he is over stepping his powers.

To be short: fuck Elon but the supreme court here is also crap and needs a reform.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 11 points 3 months ago

Idk. O think most people would say it os reasonable for a sex offender to be forbidden from being within 300 ft of a school zone. I would say that being banned from online forums like Twitter or Facebook is fair game for someone who lead an insurrection against their government. The punishment for that was a rope around the neck in most places until recently.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

My problem isnt with the punishment, never was. My problem is how these judges have been dishing their own idea of justice and trampling over all other powers in a democracy.

[-] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 3 points 3 months ago

Not removing misinformation posts, a large amount of unpaid fines, refusal to appoint a legal representative, threatening the judge.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

That’s it. You can’t receive a court order and ignore on the grounds of “I don’t think it’s legal”. The legal system is there to be used to make those calls.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Just out of curiosity: how is the blocking usually implemented? Do they block it via DNS, or is it more sophisticated?

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Is not nearly as common as you seem to imply, I have never had to deal with that kind of block in my life. It is being done by the isps themselves, thats all I know

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
718 points (99.0% liked)

News

23669 readers
3572 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS