473
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

What would happen if he did drop out? Have we ever had a presidential election that went uncontested?

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

I guess JD Couchfucker would take over. So, yeah, pretty close to uncontested. Even the crazies don't like him.

[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

The republicans would have to find someone new, really quickly.

Trump will never drop out though.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 11 points 3 months ago

But the cheeseburgers could catch up to him at any moment. He's old AF and looks to be in terrible shape.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

That would be sooo awesome.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Believe it or not, he's lost a lot of weight in the past year. He must be laying off the Big Macs (and/or downing amphetamines)

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Even if true, I refuse to believe it was intentional.

He doesn't look like he has lost any weight.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

He does to me. I first noticed it last month, then I googled it and people had first started talking about it last spring. There is a lot of speculation he's on Ozempic, but it's also possible he just learned how to shut his pie hole.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Could be stress from the felony cases. Hopefully he dies of it.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

GLP1's working on a lot of people.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 5 points 3 months ago

I would LOVE to see Trump drop out for whatever reason, and then the GOP has a vote like they did for the speaker of the house to see who takes his place. The drama of all the wackos that 1/2 of even the GOP worst dislike, mixed with all the opportunist bottom feeders, all trying to battle it out to lead the party in the new power vacuum of "yes men/women" would be just pay-per-view level entertainment.

[-] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

Or if he doesn't drop out, it will still be worth watching Trump getting weaker and weaker while the vultures are circling.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I think this is what they're hoping for: Trump holds on until the election, then kicks the bucket a month into office so Vance, a far more naked and coherent authoritarian, can take his place and start signing whatever he wants, with little to no fanfare or recognition because he's happy to just have power.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Can they though? RFK has been forced to stay on ballots in a few states because it's too late to drop out. States like MI is one and it would be a automatic win for Harris since ballots can't change.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

it would be a automatic win for Harris since ballots can’t change.

That sounds premature.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

I believe from memory (and I'd have to research this myself again) that while the ballots wouldn't change, whoever the GOP has running in his place would win the spot. You can't just win an election because your opponent disappears.

[-] odelik@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

Each state would have to decide for themselves how it works.

And yes, candidates win all the time due to their opposition dropping out, dying, etc etc. But TMK, has never happened with a presidential election.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Oh look what you did: you made Kevin McCarthy cry. I hope you're proud of yourself.

Well done!

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He could drop out, but his name would still be on the ballots like RFK Jr. Rs would have to run a write-in campaign, and that's asking a lot from the average republican voter

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 3 months ago

It’s probably too late to change candidates to a new one, so they’re stuck with Vance. Their best hope would be to parachute in someone charismatic and with appeal to a plausible “silent majority” of conservative-leaning voters à la Reagan, or at least someone who can keep his skinsuit on properly when in public. Given the way that from 2016, if not the Tea Party era, onwards, Republicans have either been primaried out of politics for being “RINOs” or else drunk deeply of the Kool-Aid and embraced the spiral of radicalism to keep up, there aren’t many plausible candidates who haven’t abased themselves.

So the Republicans would be thoroughly screwed, at least if they didn’t have the Electoral College, the Supreme Court, gerrymandering, voter suppression, the backing of billionaires and all the dirty tricks Putin and Musk between them can muster. As it stands, they may have to fight dirtier than they planned, with uncertain results.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I would agree with your thinking that it's probably too late - look at RFK, he narrowly got his name off of North Carolina ballots, they have to reprint a fuck ton of them.

He wasn't so lucky in Michigan, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled he must stay on the ballot.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
473 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19254 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS