Why Did Mozilla Remove XUL Add-ons? (yoric.github.io)

submitted 3 weeks ago by kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An old article but provides a detailed view on the choice of removing the old XUL addons

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 weeks ago

XUL was HORRIBLE to write, implement, and debug. Been there, done that. It was also 0% portable.

WebExtensions (even if there are some technical limitations and some browser manufacturers decided to intentionally cripple some of the APIs) are in general so much better. You have proper toolchains for development, translations, testing, and publishing. And it is pretty much portable to all browsers. You don't even have to port anything 99% of the time because it's just compatible.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024

70 points (97.3% liked)

Firefox

17752 readers

459 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml