250

Melania Trump made an extraordinary declaration in an eagerly awaited memoir to be published a month from election day: she is a passionate supporter of a woman’s right to control her own body – including the right to abortion.

“It is imperative to guarantee that women have autonomy in deciding their preference of having children, based on their own convictions, free from any intervention or pressure from the government,” the Republican nominee’s wife writes, amid a campaign in which Donald Trump’s threats to women’s reproductive rights have played a central role.

“Why should anyone other than the woman herself have the power to determine what she does with her own body? A woman’s fundamental right of individual liberty, to her own life, grants her the authority to terminate her pregnancy if she wishes.

“Restricting a woman’s right to choose whether to terminate an unwanted pregnancy is the same as denying her control over her own body. I have carried this belief with me throughout my entire adult life.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Who gives a fuck what the former 3rd lady attempts to say?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I do when it totally goes against her own husband's campaign.

Nah the campaign has released this prior to the book release because they think it makes trump look more balanced on women's rights.

Remember, they're not trying to win your vote, but "low information" swing voters who will decide who to vote for based on whatever meme they happen to remember.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I agree... the fact that you have people arguing about it instead of talking about Trump wanting to literally shit on democracy is a good thing for him. He believes in all publicity being good.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

I don't see how this makes Donald Trump look more balanced on women's right's. Not when it's already well-known that there's a rift between him and her.

You're not one of the idiots who's vote they're trying to win.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Who are those idiots? The MAGA faithful who's votes they already have? Because who else will this sway?

Low information voters who feel guilty about voting for trump because of women's rights.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

How would those low information voters even hear about this?

in the same way they hear about anything else.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

So... they wouldn't? Because they're low-information voters?

I don't understand this scenario where someone is both a low-information voter and aware of what Melania Trump says in her memoir. That makes no sense to me.

Maybe they say to someone more knowledgeable, "well I would vote for trump but he doesn't support abortion rights", and now a devout trump supporter can respond "well that's not really true, his wife is a strong supporter of abortion rights, I'm sure trump is too, it's just that he has to keep the rest of the party happy. You'll see once he's president"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's quite the "maybe" for something that also makes Trump look like even his wife isn't on his side to anyone who is not a low-information voter and possibly plenty who are and hear about it the same way.

So if that's the sort of stupid tactic they're going for, sounds like they're headed for failure. Good.

On the other hand, Occam's Razor would suggest she just isn't on the same page with her husband who she hates.

Nonsense. She may hate him bit she sure as shit wants him to be pres. Why do you think she releasedbthis information at this time?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Why would she want him to be president this time when she didn't want him to be president in 2016?

Do you really honestly believe that Melania Trump has written a book, scheduled publishing for after the election, but then released these specific comments, in order to undermine her husband's election chances? That's pretty much a nutty conspiracy IMO.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

It's not a conspiracy. She hates him. That's not a secret.

I'm not disputing that, but hating him, and actively trying to undermine his candidacy with a leak from your memoirs are two very different things. That's a nutty conspiracy.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Or maybe she just doesn't give a shit what he thinks. Because she hates him.

Repeating the same thing doesn't make it any more likely.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So you're saying that, despite the mountain of evidence to the contrary, she doesn't hate him?

And, despite the fact that she "cried in despair" when he won in 2016, she wants him to win in 2024?

None of that is rational. At all.

I’m not disputing that, but hating him, and actively trying to undermine his candidacy with a leak from your memoirs are two very different things. That’s a nutty conspiracy.

This is what I actually said. I don't really have much more to add.

This is so tedious. Feel free to have the last word and continue believing your nutty theory but I'm done.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Wasn't that in response to what would have been a "nutty conspiracy" about how she did it to help his campaign through some weird hope that low-information voters would somehow decide that means Trump is pro-abortion and change their vote?

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
250 points (90.8% liked)

News

23051 readers
3029 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS