27
submitted 2 months ago by giotras@poliversity.it to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nous@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

I don't think that “intermediary authorities” and “peer review” are the problem here nor will they completely eliminate disinformation and conspiracy theories on the internet. Getting rid of them does not help at all with those goals though. The big problem with publishers ATM is the closed access and processes that go on.

IMO places like Open Science Journal and PLOS are vastly better and attempting to solve the issues with the current closed and restrictive publishing models.

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Perhaps we could benefit from sth like MetaCritic for science.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
27 points (90.9% liked)

Science

13340 readers
67 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS