44
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
44 points (89.3% liked)
Steam Deck
14629 readers
179 users here now
A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.
Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.
As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title
The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.
Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.
These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.
Rules:
- Follow the rules of Sopuli
- Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
- No piracy, there are other communities for that.
- Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
- This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
- Have fun.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
What? There are loads of Linux native games, and more need to come
I know, I have many of them. Most of them I specifically bought when they got Linux support, like Tomb Raider and Alien Isolation.
Not a single commercial game runs as well natively as it does through Proton. Tomb Raider - has much worse graphics. Alien Isolation - for some reason the DPad doesn't work. Baldur's Gate - I have to supply some old openssl (or so, can't remember) library. And I shudder at the thought of trying to get Unreal Tournament 2004 or Doom 3 (not the open source version) running. I should try to dig out my disc for Ankh to see how hard it is to get that one running.
Maintained games and especially open source ones run great. But the sad reality is that it costs money to maintain software. Linux backwards compatibility is abysmal. It is much easier to get a 20 year old Windows game to run than a 20 year old Linux game.
Though to be fair, it is also hard on Windows to get a 20 year old Windows game to run. Wine is just a great piece of software.
I would love to have more native games. My own game is native as well. And luckily most indie devs usually also bring out a native port. And still most of the time the Windows version via Proton just runs better.
Yeah, wine is incredible for preservation. Many older games don't work on either platform (old windows games on windows, old linux games on linux), but running old windows games through proton usually works great.
Quake does.
Yeah the aaa and aa games don't run well because the devs or rather greedy publishers don't care about Linux gamers and hate us because they have to make actually working stuff and not rely on shitty anti cheat that has permission it shouldn't have ever.
It's funny when people like you make such statements because someone needs to literally name just a one commercial game and you're already being proven a liar. OK, I start: Selaco.
So what? They should stop taking money for unmaintained games then.
The guy said he bought games, and those don't work as well natively. You can list games all you want, if he didn't buy them it won't change his experience.
Yeah, fuck those Linux users! Only sell those games to Windows users! That will help Linux market share :)
No, he didn't say "those". He made a statement about commercial Linux games in general (edit: in a separate paragraph).
Shouldn't make a generalized statement like that then.
No idea how you get to that from my statement that's advocating to make unmaintained games free. 🤷
When a normal person talks about a topic, they don't have to continuously clarify that they still talk about the same topic, it's assumed.
He mentioned that he has a bunch of Linux native games. The commercial ones run worse compared to running under Proton. This isn't complicated. Accept that you misunderstood and move on.
Oh, now we interpret according to the intent of the author?
It's a new statement in a new paragraph.
Accept that you misunderstood and move on.
What is a new statement in a new paragraph? You didn't reference anything specific in your paragraph, so I have no idea what you're talking about.
Accept what? Move on from what? You're making no sense.