951
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

So that's almost twice as bad as the flu.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I mean, that's one way to look at it. I looked at it as only a couple percent higher death rate than the flu. Either way, a little less than 2x is way better than like 5x worse.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

Obviously it's better than before, but it's also worth keeping in mind these deaths are in addition to the flu.

Also, there are good and bad flu seasons. I see no reason for COVID to not be the same.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Even if we pedantically accept that 'almost double' is really 'just a few percent higher' while we're looking at a single digit likelihood, 'just a few percent more' than for the flu is a lot more people in overall numbers with something that spreads far quicker than the flu. We could get the death rate of Covid down to ½ the rate for the flu but if infections are more than double (this is just an example, I don't know the actual stats on this one), it still means Covid would be more deadly. Unless I'm missing something obvious.

[-] holland@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

COVID is basically a year round disease where flu is seasonal. So yeah it's gonna produce about an order of magnitude more death with just a few percent higher death rate.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That's how I understood it, too. Turns out it's a difficult thing to comprehend, though.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
951 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32523 readers
970 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS