77
submitted 5 days ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21396569

Moira Donegan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 06.07 EDT

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago

You should not support Hitler just because you think Goebbels is worse. You should work against both genociders, not be an advocate for one.

[-] banshee@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

We need STAR instead of FPTP so everyone can vote their conscience.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

Bourgeois democracy is incapable of substantially opposing capitalism, the capitalists will just pull a capital strike and hire thugs and PR people etc etc. Countries that voted in socialists found themselves, and particularly their left parties, under terrorist attacks and faced coups. Some outright banned anticapitalist parties. If you do not organize and arm yourselves, you will simply get murdered en masse.

But if alternative voting systems inspire you, I do encourage you to get involved IRL in organizing efforts. This will teach you a subset of organizing skills that are more widely applicable. You will get to see the patterns of your opponents, too. Of our opponents.

But I also recommend reading widely and critically, to challenge yourself with the material histories of left organizing and, even more importantly, its failures. Who fought us. Who won. What is GLADIO. Who is Suharto. What happened to Allende and why. What happened to the pan-Africanists, the pan-Arabs. Why is the US left so anemic? Why are the European "communist" parties so liberal? Etc etc.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz -2 points 5 days ago

Gonna be hard to work against anything when you've been executed for knowing a trans person and not reporting them.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Hitler talked about helping the "Volk" while supporting the system that kept them subservient to capital. The analogy here is not exact, but Democrat politicians are not exactly real trans advocates even if individuals sometimes are. He'll they allow big, loud transphobes to have plenty of voice in their party, they are courtkng Republicans, lauding endorsements from reactionary war criminals. As in the UK, trans people are on th3 chopping block of this faux-progressive party and it is extraparty advocacy that really keeps things afloat.

Work locally to support trans people. Build mutual aid networks, build groups that do direct action, make unions pro-trans, protect events that normalize being trans. Kamala Harris isn't doing shot for trans people except appropriation and a smile while yelling you that the naked transohkbia rampant in the party and everyday life is just the price you pay for freedom: or else.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz -1 points 5 days ago

You are correct.

and I would prefer to keep gays, trans, and women alive while we work at the local level in the meantime.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Voting for Kid Killer Kamala ain't doing that. And there is no meantime, organizing requires your help right now.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz -1 points 5 days ago

Oh so you think i should vote for Trump who will kill them himself?

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

You should vote for neither and should spend your efforts and time thinking about this to work against them and for our mutual liberation.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz -4 points 5 days ago

Ahhh, there it is. A Trump supporter in disguise.

Btw, the two aren't mutually exclusive.

I wont be replying again, feel free to have the final word.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Given that I oppose Trump and am not voting for him, it requires a bit of dishonesty and mental gymnastics to call me a Trump supporter.

Please do your best to engage in good faith and directly address what I say. Sometimes we internalize the logic of our oppressors and this can lead to incorrect actions and prevent having the right positions and coherent solidarity with others. I think that is what is happening here.

[-] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone -2 points 5 days ago

Simple question: Who do you think would be better for the country as president? Neither isn't an option, because one is happening, no matter what. Equally bad isn't an option either, as no 2 people are completely identical. It doesn't matter is objectively false, as they will do things differently, and those differences are not equivalent.

The fact is actively telling Kamala supporters not to vote is indirectly voting for Trump, and vice versa, whether you yourself turn up or not.

If you truly believe it doesn't matter, there's no reason to tell anyone to not vote, as voting and doing the other actions you recommend are not mutually exclusive.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Simple question: Who do you think would be better for the country as president?

There is no meaningful discrimination within one's power to predict. Appropriating manic cop genocidal neoliberal jingoist suit vs. uncivil blowhard racist uncle geriatric con man. Is oppression better when it is packaged with a smile and a pander? What if we remove the pander and just point at the other candidate and say, "or else". Have you considered whether this question is a sufficient look at political action, with your pro-genocide vote filtered down as support for A or B genociders chosen for you by capitalist parties and their donors and subject to the electoral college such that if you are in 90% of states, including the most populous ones, it makes no difference in the outcome outside of you saying, "that's right I don't think of Palestinians as human"? Have you thought that thought? Or are you too busy explaining lazy high school civics like nobody's ever heard of the two party system?

Neither isn't an option, because one is happening, no matter what.

Cool well I'm voting for neither so account for that in your simplistkc game theory framework. I expect to see your homework in Game Theory 1}%, module 1: Baby's First Electoralism in by Thursday by midnight EST.

Equally bad isn't an option either, as no 2 people are completely identical.

Cool so you can quantity them? Normalized to 1 with a minimum if 0, what are their scores? Is it in the real numbers, rationals, fixed digits I.E. integers plus modulo a factor of 10? Us dummies need to know!

It doesn't matter is objectively false, as they will do things differently, and those differences are not equivalent.

O oracle, lend me your sight! Will the polite manic neoliberal that receives absolutely zero opposition from you be worse than the McDonald's Toy version of a memory of a whisper of Huckster George Wallace that you walk through town in a police-samctioned parade? Tell us!

The fact is actively telling Kamala supporters not to vote is indirectly voting for Trump, and vice versa, whether you yourself turn up or not.

Thank you for acknowledging that not voting for Trump is a vote for Kamala Harris so the previous questions are moot.

If you truly believe it doesn't matter, there's no reason to tell anyone to not vote, as voting and doing the other actions you recommend are not mutually exclusive.

Your vote matters in that you may normalize genocide with it. I would ask that you be a person that is against genocide and that you don't vote for it. And then that you recognize you are not sharing wisdom but tired and old talking points that do not justify your descension and that you should care a bit more about brown people than being snarky in a Reddit clone that exists solely because your app mind-for-tif got taken away.

Incidentally, you are from an Australian instance. Kindly go work in solidarity with aboriginal groups against your rampantly racist society and your imperialist AUKUS-promoting US subject state instead of advocating for American genociders.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
77 points (79.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7170 readers
385 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS