173
submitted 9 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 74 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Don’t worry, the data will get bought up by the healthcare industry and start using it to deny coverage or to increase premiums.

“You’ve been randomly selected for a rate increase! For no reason at all! Definitely random!” - Your insurance in 2 years, probably

[-] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 1 hour ago

Devils advocate.

If you're significantly more likely to get cancer, why shouldn't you pay a higher rate? It's not fair to me who doesn't have same likelihood.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago

Health insurance industry.

Most people in healthcare hate them too.

[-] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

I’ve never thought about it like that, but you raise an interesting point. From the point of view of patients insurance is an inextricable part of health care. I’m not so sure you can separate them that easily. Even in Western Europe the trend is towards privatization so when something happens to me health wise my first concern is insurance, never mind the actual problem. It’s a tragedy. Let’s just go back to setting up a mandatory fund and paying out from that without the profit seeking middlemen. We don’t need them.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago

You know what's really stupid?

Every American who has private insurance right now, could pay that exact same amount instead to the federal government and let it pay our medical bills, and it would result in more people getting care and less cost for the healthcare industry.

Of course, for some reason, some people are strongly opposed to the destruction of a multi-billion-dollar rent-seeking middleman industry and also opposed to healthcare going to certain, shall we say, melaninistically-blessed Americans.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

Mine costs my employer and myself $15,000 yearly. Colorado marketplace insurance for a "silver" plan (probably very expensive to actually use) is over $8k.

If we all just pooled that money it'd make Medicare for All a reality.

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 21 points 8 hours ago

I'd be really interested to know my heritage but this scenario actively is stopping me from doing so.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 23 points 7 hours ago

It’s okay, you can just be like me and have both your parents do it! They may not know my exact data, but they’ve got enough to guess.

[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 11 points 6 hours ago

I really don't get this. I know where my parents and grandparents came from. Should I care if I have Irish or African blood? It baffles me that anyone does. How would that information would change my life? We should be judged by our actions, not by the origin of our distant ancestors.

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 14 points 6 hours ago

I think you get disease risk data, which does give you some useful info.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 5 hours ago

Knowing whether I have First Nations blood on my mother's side would have real legal benefits for me (my mom is estranged from her family and so has never told me much about them, but there's some possibility there given their historical context). I know a friend who had to prove he was 1/8 Metis in order to get a job as a web designer with a particular company.

I think it's ridiculous and flat out racist, frankly, but there are indeed benefits in this day and age from having particular ancestry.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

Holy fuck, how is this legal?

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 5 hours ago

"Good intentions", I presume.

My position has always been "if there are people who are disadvantaged then pass laws to help disadvantaged people rather than making the assumption that everyone with a particular set of genetics need help." I guess it's just easier to take that shortcut though.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Ah, understood, thanks

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

I’m of the same mind. Luckily my entire family is fairly skeptical of things like this. While we want to know more about our ancestry (we know the culture we’re from as it’s pretty well documented, we would like to hone down where exactly we’re most likely from. Our last name hints at it in the region but it’s still unclear.) I would rather travel across the ocean and do manual research than give my DNA to any of the ancestry companies.

The people who most benefit from DNA ancestry are people who want to know where they came from but documentation is scarce or non-existent. In the US that group is primarily composed of the descendents of slaves. It can also help people descendent of native groups who only know that they are from some native people of North America identity a particular tribe.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
173 points (98.3% liked)

News

23167 readers
2785 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS