113
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chebra@mstdn.io 1 points 1 day ago

@ReversalHatchery @velox_vulnus

It violates "freedom 0" of the Free Software Definition too, so no difference there. This limitation on use makes is non-open-source AND non-free-software. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#fs-definition

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 17 hours ago

It's clear that it's not free software, because as the name suggests, that's about freedoms.

What is not really clear is that it's not open source. To me at least it means that the source is public, you can change it, use it, send in patches, etc, but possibly with some limitations.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
113 points (89.5% liked)

Open Source

30787 readers
932 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS