322
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
322 points (96.5% liked)
Technology
58801 readers
4301 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Does it need to? Does anything need to? I'd argue that humans toying with the novelty of 'seemingly useless' things has enriched humanity by a whole lot. Archmedes basically dicking around doing fuck all in that shed of his instead of growing crops
Yes. The amount of effort and resources used to do this shouldn't just be a fucking waste.
This is a fucking waste. Proper fucking waste.
Nobody will use this math in our lifetime. Probably not the next generation either. We're incapable of using it in any meaningful way except bragging rights.
That's a presumption. Have you ever considered that there's a non-zero chance that you're wrong?
Even if it's true, he's just admitting that he doesn't care about future generations. Fuck them kids, I guess.
It's not a presumption when there is no basis for it all. It's a fucking fact.
If there was a segment of society that said "Hey, we really want to do this thing, but we really just need the highest prime number possible! Why won't anyone find that for us?" Then I'd say OK.
You've got a guy out to beat a record and get his name on the books here. Useless.
That segment exists. That's literally why they are continually trying to find larger primes.
Again, to what use?
No idea, I'm neither a cryptographer nor mathematician. All I know is that they're used somehow. Something about multiplying two large primes to get a big number. Apparently it's a challenge to factor that number to derive the original primes, and that challenge is what makes breaking a cryptographic algorithm difficult.
Any cryptography you're likely to encounter uses fixed size primes over a residue ring for performance reasons. These superlarge primes aren't relevant for practical cryptography, they're just fun.
Well allow me to retort:
There isn't a CPU on this planet that will digest this number in any meaningful way out to this decimal. Not as a whole at least.
That's why this was clearly computed on a GPU. They're good at that.
We also have news of the first stages of prime numbers being cracked on Quantum Computers with amazing efficiency. So whatever this number is will be useless soon.
If smart people thought like this, we won't have cryptography.