67
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by rikudou@lemmings.world to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The worst ~~of both worlds, good luck getting a decent print on something moving and good luck vacuuming anything with a giant thing on top of it.~~ 3d printer ever. It would be lucky just to not to get caught on anything, never mind printing on uneven surfaces is just asking for a misprint.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

I'm going to assume you decided the extra weight may improve vacuuming in some limited situation.

But thanks for leaving the correction to make me wonder for a while. Made your comment almost enjoyable.

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

No, I actually read the article and realized they ripped the vacuum part out lol

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

Lol

I'll go hide my shame

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

The most believable part of the whole thing. Standard "Tech Incubator" bullshit.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
67 points (98.6% liked)

3DPrinting

15782 readers
563 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS