41
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

By "push server" I mean something like Ntfy.sh.


Cross-posts

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Sounds like you need a browser tho. UnifiedPush & MQTT work without a browser with WebPush support.

[-] kevincox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

There are three parts to the whole push system.

  1. A push protocol. You get a URL and post a message to it. That message is E2EE and gets delivered to the application.
  2. A way to acquire that URL.
  3. A way to respond to those notifications.

My point is that 1 is the core and already available across devices including over Google's push notification system and making custom push servers is very easy. It would make sense to keep that interface, but provide alternatives to 2 and 3. This way browsers can use the JS API for 2 and 3, but other apps can use a different API. The push server and the app server can remain identical across browsers, apps and anything else. This provides compatibility with the currently reigning system, the ability to provide tiny shims for people who don't want to self host and still maintains the option to fully self host as desired.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32465 readers
426 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS