529
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 month ago

That mascot is a child. Please don't make porn of fictional children even if you disagree with the politics or religion of that fictional child you're making porn out of. Child porn is a bad thing

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 115 points 1 month ago

She is really a 2,000 year old ~~dragon~~ child of god so it's totally ok.

-some priest

[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

That seems Kanna specific 👀

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

Actually that seems fairly on brand and run of the mill for anime.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Nah priests only fuck little boys

[-] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 month ago

If she's drawn as an adult like the pucture used for the pist I don't think it would be a problem anymore, you can't really lock down a fictional character's age it just comes down to features their drawn with and I guess if someone feels the need to go out of thier way to give an age

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 1 month ago

You have to draw her with an eye patch, to show up that she's the grow up version.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] M137@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Why do you hate punctuation and just basic grammar?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 29 points 1 month ago

Child porn is a bad thing

Tell that to the priests

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Nobody except pedos will argue that child abuse is bad. AI cartoon porn in my opinion is fine. It's a victimless crime. Literally nobody gets hurt. There is no studies confirming that someone who watches pedo cartoons will end up doing real life child abuse, in fact some studies show the opposite effect.

I welcome AI porn. Cartoon or real life looking. Zero real women get taken advantage of and we get to pick whatever kink we want knowing that nobody was hurt in the making of the AI porn.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 16 points 1 month ago

I agree. Its always a tough stance. Its like ultimately I want nazis to be able to speak freely as long as they don't actually do the stuff they spout. As far as im concerned when you try to ban stuff not in reality you are in the realm of trying to ban thought.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It's a fucking drawing, who the fuck cares.

load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
529 points (96.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12577 readers
726 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS