1009
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Bernie Sanders criticizes the Democratic Party for neglecting the working class, leading to their recent election losses.

He highlights issues like economic inequality, job displacement, healthcare costs, and foreign policy as key concerns for the American people.

Sanders questions whether the Democratic leadership will address these issues or remain beholden to big money interests.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We could also do this ourselves, if we could find a way to organize it.

I’m sure with enough attention he’d acknowledge, and maybe support it.

It may sound silly but what’s the alternative?

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago

I really think ranked choice voting is the answer here. It will open up the opportunity for third parties to actually gain traction.

[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Me too but how are we going to get that changed before the next election?

Before ranked choice voting we need at least one party to rally around with a candidate that focuses on popular issues. Once we have someone in office that will commit to those issues we can then talk about these kinds of changes.

A good place to start would be at the state level since states run their own elections. For that all I can suggest is to get more actively involved in local politics than you ever have before.

Of course, that’s assuming we have another election.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Never underestimate the obstruction from establishment Democrats at every level of government. We passed a bill authorizing statewide use of ranked preference voting in CA and our neoliberal democrat governor Gavin Newsom vetoed it. I generally support his policies but this one was a flat out "fuck you" to everyone alienated by the neoliberal business as usual party that runs our state.

[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

The answer to obstruction at every level of government is to push back at every level of government then.

That means getting involved in local government. You. Me. Us. All of us. Starting now.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I'm nearly pissed off enough to try and run for local office myself now and I hope others also feel that drive.

Only reason I haven't done it is because I'm a nobody retail worker with no money. I can't afford to upend my life to go campaign. And I feel that a lot of other people are in a similar boat. But I also feel that the last hundred years of American politicians have been so far up their own asses that having a regular everyman in office like myself can't possibly be worse.

We should be able to take out a business loan or something to run for office. But also we shouldn't have to do that.

[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

TBH I would love to vote for a regular working class citizen and would gladly contribute to the local candidate that has values I agree with.

Can only imagine there are others willing to pitch in.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

That's a good question. I think we need a massive push towards it, from our local officials all the way to the top. Bernie may get onboard.

[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

True but nothings going to happen until we both demand it and actually do something about it.

The time to be hopeful that one of the major parties has an awakening is over.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Absolutely. I think that the best path of action is to let our local politicians know clearly that this is the desire of their constituents, and push hard to vote in candidates that support this. All of these politicians started somewhere, so the best hope for change starts locally and grows from there as word gets out.

[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Certainly easier to convince them than career politicians at the national level

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We must only support candidates whose main policy position is electoral reform.

[-] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Definitely need to change our voting system. I really like Veritasium's recentish video on voting systems. Sounds like approval voting is even better than ranked choice. Anything but first-past-the-post, please!

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
1009 points (97.5% liked)

News

23664 readers
4797 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS