193
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by bobbiguy2122@lemmynsfw.com to c/lemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com

Currently downvotes are enabled on a trial basis, this was done by me to see if they can be enabled to prevent spam from rising to the top of communities, along with the fact that is another form of interaction/feedback.

However I've gotten some pushback for this and so I'd like to see the general consensus of this decision. Please put any comments/concerns in this thread, and please vote here: (Link gone poll is done)

the results of this poll and the comments will determine if we keep or remove downvotes again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] c0TPc0h9tqTLylmviUC1@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Definitely enable; e.g.: lets say based on my sorting algorithm and frequency of frontpage visits, I usually see posts with ~20 upvotes (sounds like a weird oversimplification but that is kind of the case for me foe some reason)

For those 20 upvotes there might be 500 more people that believe that a post is very low quality, inappropriate for the community's topic, etc., but I still see it, since, well its score was ~20.

Without upvotes it was very frequent that I saw a post that was not (or was very-very slightly) related to the community's theme, and there is absolutely no other way for the community to filter it out. It forces me (everyone) to scroll across much irrelevant content, until maybe I give up and unsubscribe from some communities altogether, instead of helping to curate them into something people enjoy visiting.

The only other solution to this problem is to have moderators check every post that is uploaded, and, besides putting more strain to moderators, one moderator's decision might even be debatable sometimes (e.g. a post might technically fit in a community, but the people who visit it might not find it enjoyable, or will just prefer to see it in a more appropriate community).

Downvotes provide a simple solution that involves many opinions in this whole process.

The only case that not having downvotes might make sense, is "Top", in which I feel I only see posts with an insane number of upvotes (that I btw might not enjoy seeing) and nothing else. I also feel that this sorting algorithm also promotes the visibility of more generic content that a larger variety of people will enjoy, and will just upvote without considering the community it was posted in etc. But in those cases, the posts with many upvotes, can only get more upvotes (promoting the phenomenon), whereas with the ability to downvote, the final score will be more balanced, or at least leave the choice to the user (maybe indirectly via the choice sorting algorithm, or their client's settings), for if they want to see controversial posts.

Nice /s Downvotes are disabled again, I checked my comment but I don't have any way of knowing how many people disagree with me or don't believe I contributed meaningfully to the discussion.

Downvotes are not personal guys, this is not Facebook.

Not upvoting something will result in a post not gaining much traction, but there is no way to send a post down the feed if it's not appropriate for a community.

I guess I now need to start reporting posts that are out of topic

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
193 points (93.7% liked)

Lemmy NSFW

12014 readers
3 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS