484
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Avery Davis Bell faced severe complications with a miscarriage in Georgia, where restrictive abortion laws delayed her necessary medical care.

At 18 weeks pregnant, she was forced to wait for life-saving treatment due to Georgia’s abortion restrictions, which prevent immediate intervention unless a medical emergency escalates.

Bell’s experience highlights the risks imposed by post-Dobbs state laws, with maternal deaths rising faster in states with strict abortion bans.

The law’s impact on Bell’s experience highlights the inhumane consequences of abortion restrictions, which can lead to unnecessary suffering and even death.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago

"God's will."

You're never going to be able to argue against that. No amount of explaining to them the atrocious cruelty of things like this trumps "God's will" for the anti-abortionists.

If you have a miscarriage, God' will. If you die and your baby lives, God's will. If you both die, God's will. If you would have lived if you had just had an abortion, YOU MURDERER!!!!

[-] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think it’s god’s will when men aren’t able to get erections. It’s not natural to use viagara or cialis. Surely the same people so in tune with god’s will would agree with that one, right?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

You would think.

They also seem to have no problem with things like stents or insulin pumps if they need them.

Not to mention eyeglasses.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I swear, the amount of times I've had someone complain about abortions or gay people being unnatural while at the same time wearing eyeglasses and living in a place filled to the brim with televisions, phones, computers, radios, electrical lights, internet, electric ovens..

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

I mean, you can't argue against it philosophically, but you can argue against it legally, which is all that matters.

At least, you used to...

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I think it’s God’s Will(TM) that I’m about to push them in front of oncoming traffic.

[-] dgmib@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That’s not an accurate take. There are some pro-lifers who are like that but most are in favour of exceptions when it’s to save the mother’s life, or the fetus has a fatal deformity.

They just don’t (want to) understand that the intentionally vague wording of anti-abortion laws makes it basically impossible for doctors to perform medically indicated abortions until it’s too late to save the patient.

If you claim to be “pro-life” the least you can do is advocate for clear definitions of the medical circumstances where abortive medical procedures are permitted.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Most? Maybe. The ones in legislatures? Not so much. Especially not in Idaho, where even the life of the mother doesn't matter.

But you're right that they don't want to understand. They know what these "life of the mother excepted" laws lead to in practice. Especially now. And yet they haven't changed their minds. They're just putting their hands over their ears and saying, "LA LA LA LA LA!"

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
484 points (99.6% liked)

News

23655 readers
3014 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS