298
submitted 1 month ago by fukhueson@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -4 points 1 month ago

Are you not capable of responding without fabricating a complete strawman argument first?

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

This is akin to the "pardoning marijuana possession convictions" thing where it didn't apply to a single person in federal custody and only benefitted 3,000 people (with past convictions) in the entire nation.

This is basically virtue signaling and/or table scraps for us peasants.

The only thing the federal government can do is pardon federal crimes. That is what they did. You've called that action "virtue signalling and/or table scraps."

It's unclear whether you A) think that federal cannabis possession convictions shouldn't have been pardoned (considering your displeasure with the fact that they were), or B) think that such convictions should have been pardoned (as they were), but also don't like that.

Since B) is not internally consistent - you would need to not like something you think should happen - it's not unreasonable to ask if you think that such convictions shouldn't be pardoned. Frankly, neither position is easy to logically square, and you've done nothing to assist in that endeavor.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -4 points 1 month ago

How about you learn about context and read the rest of what I wrote? My complaint with both of these actions is that they're essentially meaningless for the majority of people and they don't go far enough. I refer to them as table scraps and virtue signaling because they only give the appearance of taking action without actually fixing anything or improving the lives of nearly anyone. The politicians get to parade around acting like they're working for our benefit when they're actually doing very little to help.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

So whether or not federal cannabis convictions were pardoned, or millions of people would have guarantees to overtime pay, you would have complained either way, probably about Democrats, because the actions taken weren't perfect solutions, or if they weren't taken, then "Democrats have done nothing!"

Got it.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -2 points 1 month ago

There you go with another strawman... 🙄

I call BS on millions of people getting overtime pay. The income limit is so ridiculously low that nobody would be eligible. You can fuck right off with your "because it's not perfect" false dichotomy. It's not that it's not perfect, it's that it's quite literally nothing.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

A federal judge in Texas is blocking a rule enacted by President Joe Biden earlier this year that provides overtime pay protection for roughly four million American workers.

You've convinced me! Four million people, and more next year, and then every three years after that - definitely nothing. What else should I be complaining about?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -2 points 1 month ago

Four million people, and more next year, and then every three years after that - definitely nothing.

🤦

It literally is nothing because it's blocked from being implemented as stated in your own damn quote. Even if it were implemented, it's still nothing as it only applies to a little over 1% of the country while the other 98% is struggling too.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago
  • Biden does thing to guarantee overtime to more people than it's already guaranteed to
  • Trump-appointed federal judge blocks it
  • Goddamned Biden!

???

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -2 points 1 month ago

What is that, the used car salesman's definition of "guarantee," meaning "I'm going to promise this to you, but you'll never actually get it?"

Yeah, that sounds about right.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

“Meaningless for 99.9% of people”

Corrected that for you 😂

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
298 points (98.4% liked)

News

23664 readers
3981 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS