299
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Why blame Biden for Trumps actions?

[-] BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 1 month ago

I think you misunderstand. I just won’t be calling Biden “uncle Joe” or the like because he has all the information and power in the world to have brought trump to justice, but didn’t

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

How could he bring Trump to justice as a president?

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Could've shot him in the face and then got a presidential pardon. Jokes aside, so many people overestimate the power of the US president.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago

I mean, didn't the supreme court literally make it legal for the president to assassinate political rivals? Biden just didn't have the stones to drop those fascist fucks into a black site.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I don't think Biden would want to be the one to start that habit

[-] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

This is how I see it. I doubt trump hesitates.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Except a MAGA congress gets to determine if it was okay.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -1 points 1 month ago

How is it still a MAGA Congress? All the MAGAt politicians have become landfill.

[-] Frog@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I read somewhere that decision only applies for that specific instance. Meaning it was only for Trump.

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

~~It's fun that your answer to fascism is fascism but with a guy you prefer.~~

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Did you notice the second sentence starts with 'jokes aside'

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

I did, in fact, not notice that. Sorry about that.

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

could have seal team sixed his ass

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He has immunity and won’t use it for the greater good

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Immunity from what? How could he use that immunity to bring Trump to justice?

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Presidential immunity from anything he does even the injustice of forcing trump go through trial with judges who haven’t been compromised by trump interests and face repercussions for his actions from the last 8 years

Edited to add: when they go low, go low with them

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The Court declared that a President is immune from prosecution when exercising the 'core powers' of the presidency. Not from anything they do.

If a president could force their political opponent to face trial with judges chosen by the president then that could be weaponized by future presidents like Trump or anyone like him.

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You’re right everyone should just play fair

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One simple thing he could have done would be to have not run for president again when he said he wasn't going to, making Harris have a shorter time campaigning and giving Trump a huge head start.

He can barely function from a physical and mental perspective. He should have GTFO the moment he could. It's a wonder we didn't have anyone younger from the beginning.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

What do you feel he should have done that he didn’t do?

[-] DaBPunkt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Allow the usage of long range missiles.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Early in the invasion of Ukraine Russia shared video of a functional hypersonic missle that could deliver nukes past all current air defenses. That was why he was hesitant to escalate by using long range missles.

If I remember right, since then we’ve found that Russias hypersonic missles cannot steer at hypersonic speeds and have had some misfires making them less of a threat. That plus the fact that Trump is months away from helping Russia, the strategy has changed.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Why excuse the inaction that brought trump back to power?

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

What inaction are you referring to? What do you feel he should’ve done that he didn’t do?

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Replaced Garland with someone who would actually do their job.

He could have also just shot Trump in the face, because the SC gave him a blank check to do whatever.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Replaced Garland with someone who would actually do their job.

What should he do differently? Trump has claimed that the DOJ has been weaponized to keep him from becoming president. If the court of public opinion believes that (and a lot of people do) then Merrick Garland has to be absolutely sure he can win a case before prosecuting Trump otherwise more people will believe it’s just a ‘witch hunt’ and it will be harder to try again.

He could have also just shot Trump in the face, because the SC gave him a blank check to do whatever.

The SC ruling was that Presidents have immunity when exercising the “core powers” of the presidency. I doubt shooting Trump in the face would be considered that and it would only empower future presidents to do the same.

Trump is a threat to the constitution. The president has an obligation to protect it.

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Ergo, shooting Trump in the face would be a core power of the president.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I don’t disagree but the court of public opinion would. And doing this would give grounds for the next president that comes along like Trump to just shoot their political opponents.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If the next opponent straight up said they'd be dictator on day one, and people wouldn't need to vote ever again, after leading a violent insurrection attempt, I'd fully support them being executed for sedition and treason.

The point is there's not going to be another opponent, and that's what Biden needs to stop.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I would too. But the majority of voters seem to think Trump was just joking when he said those things. And the voters get to decide what politicians get away with.

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

So you'd replace Garland and the new AG would do what, exactly? Fire Jack Smith?

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
299 points (90.3% liked)

Political Memes

5617 readers
2333 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS