210

Russia ‘fires intercontinental ballistic missile’ at Ukraine for first time (www.telegraph.co.uk)

submitted 1 month ago by Streetlights@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Supposedly, an RS-26 was launched from Astrakhan and targeted at infrastructure in Dnipro.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Afaik, ICBMs are trackibly loud. It's difficult to fire one without everyone noticing immediately

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago

But are failed launches trackable? My point is that this may not be the first attempt. If their missile systems are anything like everything else in their arsenal, a successful launch is a one off exception.

[-] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

A failed launch, as in an initially successful launch that went wrong in the air, can afterwards be spotted even on commercial satellite images: https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/09/satellite-images-suggest-test-of-russian-super-weapon-failed-spectacularly/ The usa and nato probably know long before those amateur spotters do.

If the rocket fails to launch at all when the button is pressed, then noone will be allowed to know probably. It could be that they tried to launch 10 and only 1 ignited, or maybe there was just the one. Russia isn't going to tell the truth about anything so it's anyone's guess. If it fails to ignite, then I'd expect them to just pack up the rocket again and continue to pretend doing maintenance and have soldiers guarding the stuff.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They probably are afterwards. Most sat pics trained on that have some kind of image recognition stuff running in the background and they flag that. Apparently that's how that Satan failure was also firstly detected

Edit: I also wouldn't be so sure about the ICBMs being in the same state as everything else.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You mean the weapons that are a) very very expensive b) never supposed to actually being used?

It's like their nuclear capability. Very expensive to keep in shape.

Not saying they don't have any, but if you were a corrupt russian general (are there non corrupt ones?) I bet they only took care of a couple on the houndreds.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A couple of hundred with MIRV are enough to absolutely and completely wreak havoc, not even mentioning nuclear winter and all that follows... Also, don't forget the subs