586
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] M600@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I still can't believe that so many PCs are getting cut off from software updates. Its going to be a huge security issue. There will suddenly be millions of unsecured computers being actively used. I can imagine that this will be allowed to happen.

I think Microsoft is doing this because they want to make the ultimate spy network with copilot or what ever they are calling it now. I really need to figure out how to get a single work app to work on Linux reliably. I use it for like 99% of my work, so a virtual machine is kind of useless. I honestly think I will need to wait for a native version of the app to be developed and who knows if that will happen.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

MS: I want to make Windows 11 require motherboard features that make ransomware attacks more difficult so I can say it's more secure, even though it's merely a feature of the motherboard.

Also MS: Sadly, if your tech doesn't have these features you cannot upgrade and it will be insecure because I will not make updates for it.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Are you talking about TPM 2? Because I don't think that makes classic ransomware more difficult. Also it doesn't have to be strictly a motherboard feature, e.g mine comes without a fixed hardware TPM, but my processor supports fTPM, which has up- and downsides. But it works as a TPM.

Also MS: Sadly, if your tech doesn't have these features you cannot upgrade and it will be insecure because I will not make updates for it.

Technically, this isn't true, MS will continue to update Windows 10 and even individual users can receive these officially through the Windows 10 ESU program: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/whats-new/extended-security-updates

Not that I'm in favor of what they're doing, I think they should rather support older hardware with Win 11 and require modern features only on modern systems. But from a security standpoint, their decision is actually good, as it builds a secure foundation. Most private users will just do whatever on that foundation (e.g. run random stuff from the Internet), but I think going forward, this is the right choice, though probably for the wrong reason of doing Intel a favor.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago
[-] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I really need to figure out how to get a single work app to work on Linux reliably

what work app?

I use it for like 99% of my work, so a virtual machine is kind of useless

i mean, it depends on your computer (like if your cpu & motherboard supports virtualization) but you can in theory get a VM with pretty decent performance

on my m1 macbook i have a windows VM that runs very smoothly and i can effortlessly use a gesture on the touchpad to switch between them. it's pretty cool

on linux it's a little harder to set up (i had to pay like $100 for the software on the mac) but it's doable

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
586 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
3870 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS