1048
submitted 1 year ago by Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Serious question. Is it possible to do this with very large populations? It seems like it might get inherently more complicated with several tiers of government (federal, state, county, city, etc...)

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It definitely feels like Dunbar's Number is a gate to keep this from being effective in large communities.

If we can't view more than a finite amount of other humans as being "real," how do we begin to get massively large groups of humans to care for one another? This is a question I don't have the answer to.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because you don’t have to view them as “real” to know that caring for others can make things better for you too.

I don’t think the issue is the being able to care, the issue is the arseholes turning groups against each other for their own gain.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"I only do the right thing because God will punish me if I don't" vibes lol.

Why can't you just operate from a principle of making things better for everyone?

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1048 points (81.1% liked)

Memes

45902 readers
1713 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS