520
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

What I found astonishing is that it only required a 50%+1 vote majority for something that important.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It only required that because it was a "non-binding, advisory" referendum.

I mean it was fairly obvious leading up to the vote that it wasn't just going to be taken as advisory, but there technically should have been another vote before Brexit formally happened.

Of course that wouldn't happen though, because the conservatives that wanted Brexit to happen knew they got lucky first time round, and would lose their lightning in a bottle of they'd put it out there a second time.

[-] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It doesn't. It was a non binding vote. A binding vote required 2/3rds.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
520 points (98.5% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS