949
Distro Focuses (lemmy.ca)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

You are maybe conflating stability with convenience.

"Why is this stable version of my OS unstable when I update and or install new packages...."

The entire OS falling down randomly on every distribution during normal OS background operations was always an issue or worry, and old Debbie Stables was meant to help make linux feel reliable for production server use, and it has done a decent job at it.

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean when I can take an Arch Linux installation that I forgot about on my server and is now 8 years out of date and simply manually update the key ring and then be up to date without any issue but every time I've ever tried to do many multiple major version jumps on debian it's died horrifically... I would personally call the latter less stable. Or at least less robust lol.

I genuinely think that because Arch Linux is a rolling distribution that it's update process is just somehow more thorough and less likely to explode.

The last one with debian was a buster to bookworm jump. Midway through something went horrifically wrong and dpkg just bailed out. The only problem was that it somehow during all of that removed the entirety of every binary in /bin. Leaving the system completely inoperable and I attempted to Google for a similar solution as arch. Where i could chroot in and fix it with one simple line. But so far as I was able to find there is no such option with apt/dpkg. If I wanted to attempt to recover the system it would have been an entirely manual Endeavor with a lot of pain.

I would also personally label having the tools to recover from catastrophic failure as being an important part of stability especially when people advocate for things like Debian in a server critical environment and actively discourage the use of things like Arch

If the only thing granting at the title of stability is the lack of update frequency that can simply be recreated on Arch Linux by just not updating frequentlyಠ_ಠ

[-] leezh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

No opinion on Debian but as a heavy ArchLinux user I should point out you shouldn't upgrade without reading the news as occasionally manual intervention is required. Upgrades can and will break things if you're not careful.

https://archlinux.org/news/openblas-0323-2-update-requires-manual-intervention/

https://archlinux.org/news/ansible-core-2153-1-update-may-require-manual-intervention/

https://archlinux.org/news/incoming-changes-in-jdk-jre-21-packages-may-require-manual-intervention/

[-] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean when I can take an Arch Linux installation that I forgot about on my server and is now 8 years out of date and simply manually update the key ring and then be up to date

That won't work, old pacman versions can't deal with the fact that packages are now zstandard compressed. In fact, the window were you could successful do the update without a whole bunch of additional work was something like a couple of months. Certainly a whole lot less than a year.

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, if you want to use your system pacman sure. But you can just download the latest statically built pacman to do the large jump without issues. However i will concede that is more than JUST keyring update

Edit: another fun way to get around that issue pretty easily. Boot any up to date arch installer, mount the old ass system root to /mnt and just run

pacman -Sy

pacman --sysroot /mnt

Now just normal syu and the live environment pacman will update the old system, arch/pacman has a plethora of easy ways to get around what would otherwise be show stoppers on apt/dpkg :)

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

While I personally agree with your sentiment, and much prefer arch to debian for my own systems, there is one way where debian can be more stable. When projects release software with bugs I usually have to deal with those on Arch, even if someone else has already submitted the bug reports upstream and they are already being worked on. There are often periods of a couple of weeks where something is broken - usually nothing big enough to be more than a minor annoyance that I can work around. Admittedly, I could just stop doing updates when everything seems to be working, to stay in a more stable state, but debian is a bit more broadly and thoroughly tested. Although the downside is that when upstream bugs do slip through into debian, they tend to stay there longer than they do on arch. That said, most of those bugs wouldn't get fixed as fast upstream if not for rolling distro users testing things and finding bugs before buggy releases get to non-rolling "stable" distros.

[-] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't see this thorough testing. Not for a lot of apps I use anyway. It's normal tbf even with 2 year you can't thoroughly test every package for every bug, so you're stuck with very old bugs a lot more often than people think. And on top of that some packages are so old that instructions you find on their git pages or wherever are too new and don't work.

[-] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Did you go buster -> bullseye -> bookworm or just straight to bookworm? It sounds like something got screwed up with the usr merge.

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Straight to bookworm. Sounds like that's not supported but that just further shows why i don't find it to be a functionally stable, or perhaps reliable is a better wording, system. But that's also just my opinion

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

it would have been an entirely manual Endeavor with a lot of pain.

It's funny that your phone auto corrected or you typed a capital E out of habit. I imagine you talk about Endeavor OS a lot lol.

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Was using voice to text, it auto capitalizes words at absolute random. However yes i do use EndeavorOS so it comes up from time to time :p

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
949 points (98.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21611 readers
1362 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS