203
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by solsangraal@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No not at all. I'm saying despite that, there's still nothing stopping someone from taking a car or a gun and killing someone with it.

Edit: Downvoting this comment won't make it untrue. There's an example in the very article you just read.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

by the "LaWs DoNt StoP cRiMiNaLs" logic, then we don't need any laws at all, because whoever wants to is going to break them anyway. oh but of course the same chuds bleating this nonsense are also fighting tooth and nail to ram through bathroom laws. "only harming law abiding citizens" indeed

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 week ago

Don't lump me in with the trumptards. I voted Harris. I'm just stating facts.

I have no doubt "the good christian" parents would have passed any gun laws or background checks you could throw at them.

That little girl needed better parenting, mental healthcare and to not find a gun laying around.

What new enforceable law could have prevented this?

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Guns are harder to buy = fewer guns sold = fewer guns made = fewer guns available for psychopaths, it's really not hard at all

You assuming these people would get around a background check based on absolutely nothing is not the rock-solid argument you think it is and it's certainly not justification to continue to do nothing to stop people slaughtering toddlers.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

I'm not making an assumption about how criminals obtain guns. That's just statistics. They either buy them before they have a record or they steal them. I suppose some percentage is private sales done on the DL.

Take guns away from psychopaths and they'll switch to explosives. I think we should focus on the psychopaths instead of the tools that they're using.

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Why does it have to be one or the other? What makes you think there's only one solution to this very complex problem?

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

it's astounding to me, that there are still people well aware that there are many many countries without a severe constant school shooting problem because of gun control laws, and it's still basically "we've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas!!!"

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

I believe america's problem is that people are miserable. Sure if we didn't have millions of guns all over the country of would help. But we do have millions of guns all over the country, right now, today. The cat's out of the bag. Even if we stopped all sales and manufacturing of guns right now, there are still millions of guns all over the country.

So I think the best avenue now is to focus on mental health and making this country not a be hellscape that a large percentage of people hates living in. Happy kids don't shoot up schools.

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Do you think there'd be more or fewer accidental deaths on our roads without the licensing system?

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Our current licensing system is a joke but I agree it helps. Cars and guns should require some demonstration of competence with those things.

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Then stop arguing against gun control, duh

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
203 points (99.0% liked)

News

23655 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS