473
submitted 1 week ago by robinoberg@feddit.uk to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 6 days ago

You really had no interest in engaging with me did you? Because I basically fully agreed with you in my previous comment and you said I wasn't open to ideas.

[-] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

You failed to be adequate in either reading comprehension or presentation.

[-] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

OK. I'll assign more benefit of the doubt.

To be moral and ethical in their voting choice, to serve systemic design intent, to serve the practicalities of implementation, an individual need not care about others' votes.

So, it's incorrect to set as a prerequisite a belief in success of a 5% goal to vote for it. Presenting as you did exemplifies the propaganda-fed ego of the neoliberal. The meaning in voting is not to make you feel good about yourself for choosing the bandwagon that wins. All should vote for whom best represents them with reckless disregard for the short-term outcome.

The eventual counterargument to what I'm saying is rooted in utilitarianism: Democracy produces at best mediocre outcomes. The systemic design answer was the electoral college.

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
473 points (77.9% liked)

Memes

45899 readers
1332 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS