204
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
204 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19241 readers
1767 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, can't help but feel nothing for these faith based idiots.
I didn't particularly like US health insurance companies but this is a special type of unregulated conjob. Live by the grift get fucked by the grift.
Doesn't change the fact that the people running these sketchy scams should be brought to justice and the whole thing should either be regulated or outlawed.
Outlawed, definitely. Because fairy tales and ancient superstition are not medicine.
I think you’re conflating things here — the faith bit is just that those running the scheme are flouting their religion. The scheme itself is designed to look like a cooperative, where everyone shares the costs, without it somehow being labeled gambling or socialism.
The base concept is sound; it’s the window dressing and the actual operation of the scheme that’s twisted.
My statement still applies
I mean I would think so too but legally they haven't done a damn thing wrong and since we're lead by idiots who believe in Christian theocracy that doesn't understand the whole parable of Jesus and the moneylenders, they won't ever be prosecuted or regulated because they think grifting people for money in the name of the Lord is perfectly fine.
That pretty much sums up most organized religion.
I don't know, maybe ensuring their flock cant afford to donate to political campaigns should be considered a public service.
There are people who skip meals to donate to Trump.
At one point it appeared cheaper than conventional insurance; dome people might have been chasing that instead of religious kookery.
When I worked for a firm too small to offer insurance, and there was still a mandate with teeth, a broker I visited suggested it because it was ~$250 per month compared with 400 for real insurance.
When I had my first full time job it didn't come with benefits so I seriously considered one of these programs. In the end it seemed like it was just as risky as avoiding hospitals and going into medical debt when absolutely necessary.