106
submitted 4 days ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/videos@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago
[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago

That's one theory, but weakly supported.

[-] Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago

Weakly supported? Yes. But highly probable? Also yes.

[-] Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Weakly supported? Yes. But highly probable? Also yes.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

If you watch the video, it does make case for it to just be historical and fashion-led trend.

[-] Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Lol I will watch the video, but I don't need to, to know that the purse theory is wrong. It's just that the correlation between the two is funny.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

For sure, and a very alluring conspiracy theory. Maybe at some point it had some truth, but today, it makes no sense. H&M selling pants without pockets doesn't make a difference in H&M's purse sales, and could potentially be giving competitors who sell purses money.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
106 points (92.1% liked)

Videos

14425 readers
132 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS