297
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
297 points (99.0% liked)
politics
19239 readers
1873 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know it's still illegal, but if he didn't know that's not nearly as salacious as what was suggested (I thought this was more than one, like a regular thing). I guess the rumors were hyped up. Or the evidence was not provable enough to document?
There's a huge difference between being told their age, and lying about it, and intentionally not asking for their age, knowing they're a junior in high school (the math is easy) so you have plausible deniability.
He was a Lawyer FFS. Of course he knows the tricks of the trade.
He absolutely knew they were underage. But because he explicitly didn't ask, and they explicitly didn't tell, he has plausible deniability.
You don't fuck around with "teens" and not ask their age/get verification if you're on the up and up. It's really fucking easy to ask for their age, or some form of ID to prove it so you avoid jail/legal repercussions.
Not doing that says a lot more about his intent than anything else in the article.
I don't know Florida's law, but mine (and others) say things like "did knowingly, or was negligent in". If they met at a bar/club that's checking IDs, that would probably be ok. But I somehow doubt that's where he met the high schooler. High schoolers tend to associate with other high schoolers, in places full of high schoolers.
It was at a sex party after paying a friend $400 to provide the girl. If you didn't ask questions then it's because you didn't want to know.
In this particular situation, "didn't know" and "didn't care" are the same.
The document found gaetz violated floridas statutory rape law.
The report found many laws broken, but the DOJ was not acting on any of the information during their investigation and it sounds like were not particularly helpful in the House Committee's investigation.
So just because gaetz wasn't charged with anything doesn't mean that he didn't break any laws. The house report and appendices have quite a bit of evidence in it including text conversations, interviews with victims, payment history, and more.
A civil suit might be a winner.