83
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He literally wrote new bills to get around the court block. Several afaik, at least one went through and some like above he won't finish in time.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 2 days ago

Not really but keep saying that.

He was also more than happy to start payments back up as a compromise with gop that also got nothing in return.

But yeah he totally was doing it

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

https://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/biden-harris-administration-approves-additional-428-billion-student-debt-relief-nearly-55000-public-service-workers-0

Latest action brings approved relief to almost $180 billion for 4.9 million borrowers

Keep going through mental gymnastics to say but but but Biden bad.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 days ago

Yes following the laws that should have already discharged that debt big win for him...

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What are you even saying? Do you mean that as two sentences?

Iirc the problem the court found was the relief was too broad, they said it had to be based on more individual criteria. So he worked on more bills doing exactly that. So it's not "following the [same] law".

I think I'm out, you are willfully ignoring things just to say but but but but but but but Biden bad.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 days ago

The debts he's actually discharged are from laws that have been on the books for years.

Again he's done any of the stronger methods since only trying the heros act powers.

I think I'm out, you are willfully ignoring things just to say but but but but but but but Biden bad.

Amazing how that's always the response when shit like this is pointed out.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

If you keep getting these responses after you willfully ignore information, yeah you should take a look in the mirror and do some reflection. Why do I bother, ciao.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

Pointing out what has and hasn't been done is ignoring information now?

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
83 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2092 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS