763
submitted 2 days ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago

In Florida a 17 year old can consent.

Matt Gaetz being older than 24 is the illegal part. He groomed a young girl.

Also, because he paid her, then the offense involves the procurement of a person who is under 18 years of age, so the charge increases to a second degree felony, which can result in up to 15 years of imprisonment, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 18 hours ago

If it only costs $10,000 to do that then it's only illegal for poor people

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Welcome to America.

Where "Speeding fine" has totally opposite meanings depending on how rich you are.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

I like the Swiss and Finnish laws for speeders. The fine is based on your income.

[-] IDrawPoorly@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

Isn't it a felony above a certain amount of speed, though?

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

That needs to be proven. An expensive traffic ticket attorney could get the charges dismissed (scrutinize the evidence, challenge the officer’s observations, find fault in equipment etc.).

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=96698

[-] pythonoob@programming.dev 1 points 15 hours ago

I think 25+ is wreckless endangerment or some such and more illegal than other types of speeding. This is all based on my shitty memory. I just generally don't speed.

No she couldn't consent to anyone over 24, which he was. Also, I would have to play catch-up, but if this is one of the girls he flew to New Jersey to have sex with... It's sex trafficking a minor right?

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I think consent is the wrong word here. A 17 year old can consent to a subgroup of people (under 24). Therfore she is above the age of consent.

The girl has full control over her decisions but, more importantly, should not be charged with any crime.

Gaetz on the other hand ...

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Consent is tied to legality. You can consent to a credit card at 18 but not 17.

I can tell someone it's fine to punch me in the face, and you could call that consent. When the person next door sees it out the window and calls the police, they show up and will arrest them. Both parties say they approved of it and no one wants to press charges. Tough shit, if they follow the law they arrest the person, charges for assault are placed against the person who punched by the State it happened in.

The "victim" who thinks they consented can tell the state prosecutor they don't want there to be charges when they get a subpeno to show in court.

So did I ever actually give consent? No... I never had legal right to at any age.

(There are some loop holes in a few states, and ways to get out of it, but you get the point)

Note: This is a another huge example of how laws are broken and ignored by companies and people with money as well. An NFL contract may list that consent was placed to be hit during a tackle, but when a play is over and someone intentionally kicks someone in the ribs, slams someone's head down into the ground again or hits a player the league "fines them or suspends them" but they are criminal charges so they should be out in front of a judge. Why would they be exempt from the law.

Fun example: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CgjAN_wgmiI

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 hours ago

Nobody goes to jail if you don't press charges bucko. Nice try though.

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

That's not how criminal law works, actually. In criminal courts the State brings charges regardless of the victims wishes.

Is there a c/confidentlyincorrect ?

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You have no idea how assault charges go. The charges are from the State, not a person. It isn't a civil case. (Also you could be in another country, so maybe it is different in your country)

Also a civil suit can be filed separately for restitution by the person. So you could have criminal and civil suits side by side

Note: most domestic violence charges in the U.S. the partner does NOT want charges to be placed.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
763 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19239 readers
1923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS