Human thought crawls at 10 bits per second, Caltech study finds (www.techspot.com)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

150 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thanks to @General_Effort@lemmy.world for the links!

Here’s a link to Caltech’s press release: https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/thinking-slowly-the-paradoxical-slowness-of-human-behavior

Here’s a link to the actual paper (paywall): https://www.cell.com/neuron/abstract/S0896-6273(24)00808-0

Here’s a link to a preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10234

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 0 points 19 hours ago

Bits are binary digits used for mechanical computers. Human brains are constantly changing chemical systems that don’t “process” binary bits of information so it makes no sense as a metric.

imagine someone tells you they measured the temperature of a distant star, and you say "that's stupid, you can't get a thermometer to a star and read the measurement, you'd die", just because you don't know how one could measure it.

It’s not about how you measure it, it’s about using a unit system that doesn’t apply. It’s more like trying to calculate how much star costs in USD.

[-] scratchee@feddit.uk 9 points 13 hours ago

Bits are also a unit of information from information theory. In that context they are relevant for anything that processes information, regardless of methodology, you can convert analogue signals into bits just fine.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Maybe try looking into the topic instead of confidently repeating your wrong assertions? You're literally pulling a "my hand is not a number!" right now.

Just because you have a limited understanding of a unit, doesn't mean that unit is only applicable to what you know. Literally the star example I brought up.

[-] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 1 points 5 hours ago

I already did before I formed my conclusion. It’s clear you have not and are just looking for someone which whom to argue.

Goodbye.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Ah, so you just choose to ignore information you don't already know? What a rational thing to do. You're not anti-intellectual at all.

Or are you seriously trying to gaslight everyone into believing Shannon entropy doesn't exist?

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024

66 points (72.6% liked)

Technology

60112 readers

2516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS