302
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml to c/games@lemmy.world

Valve refused to comment for the video.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Not going to happen since Valve doesn’t want to manage a database of IDs. It’s why sex games with real life actors aren’t allowed on Steam since that would require Steam to have IDs and consent contracts of all the actors stored on their side.

And Gaben is a hardcore libertarian, probably despises government IDs.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Previously, I had mused over vague ideas about whether blockchain technologies could go into a "proof of real person" system, by one-way-hashing information used to verify only basic details about a person. Eg: They exist, are a unique person, and are over a certain age. Ideally, it could be set up in a way that cannot easily correlate them between company databases.

That said, no real need to poke holes in the idea, because...that was the easy part, and it will probably never happen (or be far more draconian than I describe)

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It absolutely can be done with zero knowledge proofs, but it needs to be from an authoritative source.

It could prove you are over the age of 18 (or 21) without having to divulge any other sensitive information, and be untrackable between sites or any outside agency (e.g government doesn't know and can't know you visited a site or location that verifies your age)

They could add it to our drivers licenses or passports or whatever which would cover the authoritative part. Your ID is an NFT at that point, and could be fully digital.

Edit: they might even tie generating the proof to requiring a biometric verification (fingerprint) so you can't give your ID to someone else.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Zero Knowledge proofs are so fucking cool.

Say what you will about crypto in general, but the math behind some of the stuff is just so elegant.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

No one has ever denied the math wasn't cool. It's just that the usecase (NFTs) were terrible. I guess the hype has now died down so we might see some actual uses, like land ownership information.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It's just that the usecase (NFTs) were terrible.

It's the use case for digital images.

NFTs in general are still cool. Concert tickets, tokenzied stocks, land ownership, car ownership, digital keys (that can open digital or physical things), digital IDs, it's endless what can be done with them, but it's a long way until some of these things get adopted.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 2 minutes ago

It's one thing to put those into the blockchain and it's a completely different challenge to have a software infrastructure which incorporates the tech end2end. Example - someone put a random image of someelse else's ticket into the blockchain. The ticket checker needs to have a checker app on his phone which can verify this in real time. It's trivial using centralized DBs.

Hopefully we'll get there one day.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Well I was referring more to things like Monero, not NFTs...

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
302 points (91.9% liked)

Games

32989 readers
1219 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS