301
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml to c/games@lemmy.world

Valve refused to comment for the video.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Anivia@feddit.org 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, the app is completely open source and has reproducible builds. And the site you are accessing only gets the information it requested, and you see which information it requested in the app before scanning your ID

https://github.com/Governikus/AusweisApp

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I looked deeper are read up. Everything I can find says the age verification function is not anonymous. There is an anonymous login function, but that doesn't seem to include age verification.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world -3 points 19 hours ago

Now you are starting to sound like you know what your talking about. But I'm not convinced yet. So when the app sends just the requested data to the site, how does the site verify that the data is legit. A person could fork the app and hack it. I am sure they thought of this, I just don't know what thier solution is. And I can't read german.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

(NotOP) these things will usually use cryptographic signatures and if the app has been altered, it'd fail the check.

No clue what they are specifically doing though.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, something like that. But while your device can validate the cryptographic sig for the app, the site requesting proof of age can't, since it isn't running on the same device as the app. The best I can guess, the app could request verification from the state run site, and specify what information it wants (based on what the requestor site asked for). The state site could use a private key to encrypt the response and give it back. The app could use a piblic key the state makes available to decode and confirm that only the intended information is present. Then the app can pass that to the requestor, who can get the public key from the state site and decrypt the information. But, the gap there is how does the requestor know the app it is talking to hasn't been modified. I don’t think there is a way that it can. Only the device the app is on can verify that. And the requestor can't trust the device either.
Some Authentication that I remember has a component where the requestor would then talk to the state to confirm the info it got from the app was requested from the state by the same app the site is talking to. This prevents using someone elses response as your own. But in this case, that would tie the site to the request which means the state would have both peices of info, who and what site. So I don’t know what there solution here could be that wouldn't result in the same problem.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

They could (but didnt) do it with zero knowledge proofs as well. Then the website could go back and verify against the state site and no private information would be leaked.

The state would know the site requesting it via IP, but they wouldn't know which proof they were validating.

It's often talked about in the blockchain crypto space, but it's not the only way to use them. You could use it in a centralized system like this too.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
301 points (91.9% liked)

Games

32989 readers
1219 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS