27
Why Do We Always Give the Russians a Warning?
(www.wsj.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
27 points (90.9% liked)
Ukraine
8131 readers
815 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Cluster Bombs weren't given to improve Ukraine's standing per se, they were given because we ran out of M795 standard issue shells.. Then, we bought South Korean shells to make up the difference. Then we ran out of those and are now forced to give them cluster munitions (which we have a large stockpile of but never intended to use).
We still don't like using them, because each cluster-artillery shell scatters 4 to 5 grenades into Ukrainian soil that may kill a farmer 50 years from now. So even as we give them to the Ukrainians, we tell them to use them sparingly and only when absolutely necessary, as it will damage their own country every time they shoot that shell.
We didn't really give Russians warning with regards to Phoenix Ghost drones, I don't think we gave them warning on Excalibur precision (1m accurate) 155mm shells, I don't think we gave warning on many other munitions. Etc. etc.
Plus we're clearly undershooting our estimates and giving much more. Russians will try to estimate how many international gifts they deny their enemy, counting ammo cases around arty dumps before dropping incindiaries, etc. It makes sense to give Ukraine ~20% more than we advertize, so that if/when Ivan says "we got all the advertized Himars or Drones or whatever" they can get a nasty kick in the balls for taking the risk to escalate, believing the threat is gone.