592

Summary

Key leaders of the “Abandon Harris” movement, which encouraged voters to oppose Kamala Harris due to U.S. support for Israel during the Gaza war, are now expressing unease about Trump’s incoming administration.

Many in the movement, including prominent Muslim leaders, voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East.

However, concerns are growing over his Cabinet picks, such as Mike Huckabee and Tulsi Gabbard, which some see as troubling for Muslim communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Okay, at the risk of being censored: You're actually being stupid.

We do NOT support the current Democrats, nor the party, nor their way of doing things. We supported trying to make sure Trump did not get a second term by standing beside the only candidate(s) that had a chance because there wasn't anyone else. So stop for a second and think because it's clear you're a single issue voter: You can't stop repeating the same faulty freaking logic.

Then is not now.

Then does not mean we supported them.

We wanted a better world. Days where we don't have to worry so much. We support Gaza and Ukraine.

If this and much, much more means supporting the opponent of a would-be dictator, then we fucking do so. That's the difference. WE SAW THE BIGGER PICTURE and did what we had to do.

It was what had to be done. The Dems fucked up their messaging. However, people like you chose to fuck our home and possibly the world to greater and lesser degrees because you stand so damned fucking stalwart it's like trying to convince a brick wall to fall over with kind words of encouragement. If I live through these next four years I hope to be a part of the team that writes the history books. If I am I'll make sure to cite people like you, @MisterScruffy , for your contribution towards tyranny and dictatorship.

And for the record: Yes, I'm pissed. Not at you, you're dumb. At what brought us to this point.

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago

How did I contribute to tyranny?

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

"Genocide Joe". This cycle the only people who called him that were individuals who wouldn't vote for him. Typically single issue Gaza voters. That and what you've said makes me believe you either abstained from voting, or voted third party, maybe even voted Trump though that is less likely.

If I'm right then you are part of the problem. In situations like this last election, the status quo, which has shown it will budge and move at least a bit, is much better than a party who has literally been recorded saying incredibly malicious and evil things, nevermind what Trump has claimed. This is a worst case scenario. It's a valley where incredible change can happen in either direction and voters like you are a direct cause of this. Just look at how you repeated the same tired arguments three times in your replies. Ones you've probably repeated a hundred times, "Don't vote for Genocide Joe".

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago

In order to stop Trump you have to win. Period.

Refusing to consider valid criticism of the guy you're supporting is how the dems lost. If you want to win stop doing the thing that made you lose. You keep doing it which makes me think you want to lose. Which makes me think you aren't really worried that much about trump.

The playbook that you are still following for some reason is a losing playbook. Keep doing it if you want to keep losing.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Once again you're wrong and you're clearly stuck, refusing to actually listen. It's all outlined. At this point I'd just be repeating myself. Not everything is black and white, there are nuances in the grey. Figure it out.

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml -1 points 22 hours ago

You want to lose, so don't be surprised when you lose again

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
592 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19254 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS