474

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23718803

Summary

The Taliban have banned windows in homes that allow views of areas where Afghan women might be seen, citing concerns over "obscene acts."

This new decree mandates blocking or obstructing such windows in existing and new buildings, continuing the group's systemic repression of women since regaining control of Afghanistan in August 2021.

The Taliban's policies have included bans on women's education, public appearances, and voices.

Critics, including the U.N., warn these actions dangerously erode human rights, while activists call out global inaction over the ongoing oppression.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] finley@lemm.ee 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

What “obscene acts” are they referring to? Are they afraid someone might see a woman reading a book?

[-] JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca 25 points 6 days ago

They are afraid a man seeing a woman will cause him to rape her.

[-] Flipper@feddit.org 10 points 6 days ago

By that logic every sauna should be a rape orgy. Turns out, that's not the problem. But what can you expect from a religion with a „She asked for it“ mindset.

[-] MITM0@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago

Very clearcut Islamophobia buddy, never knew Leftists were this bigoted

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -5 points 6 days ago

Okay no matter what issues you have with Islam generally, trying to generalize Taliban actions to Islam in general doesn't make sense. These people aren't just fundamentalist or whatever, they're legit batshit insane. Also just to make that clear, Islam doesn't have a "she asked for it" mindset.

[-] Flipper@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago

I have a problem with religion in general. It is always a tool of oppression. It doesn't really matter if how you slice it, but the abrahmic religions are just especially bad. You always have the the priest class that is better than the rest and most of the time the incredulous are worth nothing. The fundamentalists just make this inherent property of religion stronger and worse.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -4 points 6 days ago

Even if what you said was true, you're not backing your claim about the "she asked for it" mindset.

You always have the the priest class that is better than the rest

Okay lemme tell you: That is straight up projection. Only Christianity has that. Maybe Judaism does too I'm not sure about that one, but I can tell you that Islam sure as hell doesn't. Islam is, surprisingly enough, not organized religion in the sense atheists in the West like to hate about. In fact, it's very critical of the way Judaism and Christianity put their priests above their stations, likening it to worship in at least one instance.

most of the time the incredulous are worth nothing.

The who?

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

So imams don't have more social influence than the average Muslim at the mosque?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago

Lemme answer as an Egyptian Muslim:

That depends on what you mean by "social influence", but "imam" only really means "someone who leads the prayer" so it's not really a big deal in and of its own. Hell, in many/most mosques the imam can't come for all prayers so you'll have random community members leading the prayer the other times. The concept of the imam of a mosque is really more one of convenience than anything else.

That said, the "official" (as in appointed by the government or whoever runs the mosque) imam of a masjid is also often/most of the time an Islamic scholar, which culturally and religiously is a career that commands a certain around of respect. He also usually lead any charity work they have in the mosque (in mine they make food for poor community members daily during Ramadan and weekly otherwise). That's it. The whole thing is rather mild; they range from just community to respectable community members, and they don't get to demand obedience or have any sort of decisive power. Also on an institutional level, I can for example tell you that the modern Azhar is full of shit and reject their rulings if I think that another ruling makes more sense, which happens a lot, without needing to create a whole new sect stares at Protestantism.

BTW just to make that clear, an Islamic scholar is anyone who studied Islam and reached a certain degree of proficiency; it's something anyone can become and not gatekept by an institution. I could become an Islamic scholar if I wanted to right now (and had the brainpower to remember all the stuff they're supposed to remember) without having to go to the Azhar or any other institution.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

That’s probably what they’re thinking. (And they should totally lock those men up…)

But I’m thinking the real problem is that they were sending messages through the windows and they can’t have that.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago
this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
474 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12629 readers
243 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS