69
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
69 points (94.8% liked)
News
23770 readers
3696 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
NOLA.com is the local news outlet in New Orleans. Good paper.
CBS is reporting the same thing.
From the same source? Because it doesn't matter whether the paper is good or if more than one outlet is reporting it if it's all from one bad source.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/law-enforcement-officials-identify-suspect-new-orleans-attack-rcna185929
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/shamsud-din-jabbar-new-orleans-attack-suspect-b2672503.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/01/us/new-orleans-truck-attack-terrorism-fbi.html
https://www.theadvocate.com/news/crime_police/new-orleans-suspect-bourbon-street-attack/article_578911df-d5cb-5822-9968-595ec98fc491.html
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/01/01/law-enforcement-identify-suspect-new-orleans-attack/77381195007/
All of those have "law enforcement" as their source for the identity.
I'm with @FlyingSquid@lemmy.world on this one.
By law enforcement, they mean an FBI press statement. But if that's not good enough for you...
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-statement-on-the-attack-in-new-orleans
Early reporting on the Oklahoma City bombing was pointing fingers at Muslims, too.
If you don't accept what any law enforcement says, even though they have his body and ID, you could have just said so and there would have been no reason to respond to you.
First of all, there is no telling if he is Muslim. Secondly, the FBI tends to have more than one piece of evidence before making such a statement. But, by all means wait.
I'm not going to apologize for not trusting law enforcement.
I don't care. I think it's always good to have a bit of skepticism, but when facts slap you in the face you should realize it. Some times not everyone feels it.
Your responses suggest otherwise.
As I said, if I had known you wouldn't believe what anyone says, there would be no reason to respond
I'm not going to apologize for not trusting law enforcement.
And yet you respond.
Because I didn't know you believe in conspiracy theory. But, I will respond no further if it makes you feel better
Not sure where you got the idea that I "believe in conspiracy theory." That would mean that there's something unreasonable that I believe is true.
"Not taking the word of law enforcement as fact" doesn't mean that I believe something unreasonable. It means that a statement from law enforcement alone is not enough to convince me that that statement is true.
I'd argue that if you're willing to take statements from law enforcement as truth without corroboration, you're going to find yourself carrying water for fascists more often than you'd like.