193
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 week ago

it's a matter of time before all the porn sites effectively go "we don't want to deal with this legislation or with handling the PIIest of data. we'll just IP block this whole region"

[-] algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 days ago

That is actually what is happening. Nothing in the Florida law blocks these sites, they just don't want to deal with it.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah, I was under the impression that these porn sites got blocked... But it's the other way around, the porn sites block the users because they don't/can't implement the regulations.... Thx for explaining.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 30 points 1 week ago

The regulations are essentially "you need to take the ID of everyone who uses your site and hand it over to the government to protect the children". Privacy be damned, and I guarantee it's going to become more and more widespread.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I got some eID and it's supposed to do age verification for like a decade now. And they must have hired some proper computer science experts, because the idea was to implement this as a "zero knowledge proof". Which is a very nice concept: You can prove your age to a porn site completely anonymously, without revealing anything (not even your exact age), just that you're above a certain age.

Of course no one uses that system 😑

The technology for sure is out there. So if the true motivation is to block access for minors... We could just do it. Only takes an id with a chip on it and/or a smartphone app.

[-] ego@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

Just like accessing direct messages or any other form of personal data, it's never actually about the children.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sadly true. And happens we've just started discussing total internet surveillence again, here in Germany. This time it's an exception from the rule and not about the usual "would someone please think of the children". But it's not any better. For some reason they're always pushing for data retention / surveillance / snooping on private messages here.

That's the point of the regulations. Directly banning porn sites would be unconstitutional, but there's a loophole.

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 14 points 1 week ago

Kind of how they went after marijuana in order to target Black people.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
193 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37830 readers
844 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS