191
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Trantarius@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 days ago

If they actually wanted to protect children, the answer is simple: reverse the responsibilities. Require porn sites to include metadata indicating it isn't safe for minors. Require browsers to recognize that metadata, and filter out that content if parental controls are enabled. If parents are still too lazy to turn it on, make it default (like "safe search", but more effective). The fact none of them have even suggested this is proof they don't care about children or even porn, they just want to be seen as if they do.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 5 points 4 days ago

Parental control software like Adguard or Adguard DNS family protection, filter out NSFW content like this website. A website doesn't even need to do a thing for it to work.

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 4 points 4 days ago

They don't care about anything other than watching you. They don't care how old you are. That's just an excuse.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah I hate when the real topic gets buried in nonsense white noise. This is PURELY about collecting those IDs and data.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37825 readers
859 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS