3

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/34730043

For instance I know some lawyers and insurance CEOs who built the company themselves and run an ethical business model but because of innovation have made a ton of money. One lawyer has made a name for himself only defending those who have been hurt my big corporations and their life is ruined. The other made an insurance model that helps these hurt people invest their court winnings into annuities to guarantee they’re financially taken care of for life. These are not billionaires but both companies have won for their clients/work with hundreds of millions if not billions.

How can one clearly define someone like Musk or Bezos as bourgeois whereas these hard working individuals who came from nothing and build a huge business actually from nothing and help people?

Hoping for a non-black and white answer. My local MLM group declares everyone evil who isn’t their exact ideology. It doesn’t make sense to apply this thinking when someone whose become rich through helping people isn’t the same as someone whose has taken advantage of people for generations.

Edit: getting downvoted to hell when I am asking a question sure isn't welcoming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Thanks for clearly reframing my question Cowbee :) not just saying this doesn’t matter for Marxist thought but why.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

No problem! Again, I don't want to absolve Capitalists from terrible behavior, just want to reframe your thinking about Marxism in general.

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Well you succeeded :)

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
3 points (60.0% liked)

Communism

1774 readers
56 users here now

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS