90
Experts say high food prices are here to stay. Here's why
(www.cnbc.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
90 points (84.1% liked)
News
23770 readers
3699 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What the average American doesn’t understand is that
The government only has control over inflation when it comes to prices
Controlling inflation only controls the RATE of rising prices
Once prices are up, they don’t go down because prices always go up over time in a healthy economy.
Prices would go down if the government was serious about taking on the monopolies in the supply chain (meat packing, industrial farmers, grocers with local monopolies, etc.). If they were serious about antitrust, prices would go down and you wouldn't get a recession, on the contrary, it would create jobs and grow the economy.
Fat chance of that happening under this administration (or an alternate universe Harris one either).
I’m not disagreeing with your suggestion, but in that situation what would actually happen over the short term is prices would stay the same for much longer. Which is healthy for an economy.
Over a longer term people will make more money and $10 eggs won’t feel as expensive.
It’s not as exciting of a proposition, which is why most people don’t bother explaining it.
Prices for other goods have gone down (TVs, computers, etc) in the past without being disastrous for the economy. You're right if we're talking about deflation generally (ie. ALL goods), but that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about tackling prices in specific, anti-competitive sectors like food, health care, etc, where there's plenty of room for prices to go down. And all of those things are necessities where consumers can't delay spending on them, so deflation wouldn't even have its disastrous effect there (which is customers withholding spending because they can get more with the same money if they wait a month).
If you were to introduce competition within the whole chain all at once between farmers and consumers, prices would definitely go down. Obviously that will never happen because the government acts slowly and it can take a decade for a case to make it all the way through the courts, so within the current political context of the USA you'd never see prices go down. Economics itself doesn't dictate that, and it wouldn't be harmful if say the prices of eggs halved overnight due to more competition in the market or price controls, as long as it's still profitable for the producers of the good.
Monopolies don't necessarily mean higher prices and breaking them up wouldn't immediately solve high prices and would probably cause prices to go up further (as you're creating instability).
Not that going after monopolies is bad, and long term would help, but it isn't going to fix the current situation.
LOL that sounds like a massively over simplified statement. would you care to elaborate?
prices go up, period--that's true, but calling an economy "healthy" because of that is like saying "healthy people eat food"
i think the average american has very little understanding of what money actually is and why inflation is even a thing, rather, they just take it as a fact of life. like school shootings. like "yea, it's not fun, but there's nothing we can do" LOL
According to Piketty, anyway, general inflation did not actually start until the industrial revolution. The price level was otherwise stable throughout history up to that point. It's not just an incontrovertible fact of life, although it seems that way now.