481
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Democrats blame Attorney General Merrick Garland for delaying prosecution of Donald Trump over the January 6 Capitol attack, allowing him to win reelection before facing trial.

Critics argue Garland wasted critical time before appointing a special prosecutor in late 2022, enabling Trump to evade accountability due to DOJ policy barring prosecution of sitting presidents.

While Trump faces ongoing civil lawsuits, his return to power threatens pardons for convicted rioters and continued revisionism about the attack.

Despite public disapproval of Trump's actions, he successfully leveraged misinformation to regain the presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 221 points 3 days ago

No shit, we should have prosecuted and jailed him the second that shit happened. Instead, we spent the entire time debating whether a president can be prosecuted, and then concluded, nah bro, presidents can't be prosecuted, lol.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

and then Biden proved how weak he is by not immediately using that free pass to solve the problem.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 83 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They let Hitler go free too (though he did do jail time). That turned out well.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 77 points 3 days ago

the road to fascism is paved by the judiciary

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 days ago

If you all haven't already, I'd like to suggest that you create a PAC for running for president. This is your license to commit federal crimes without any consequences.

State crimes TBD in a few weeks.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago

You have to be a Republican, though.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Easy enough to chuck a couple of bucks toward the GOP. For the sake of committing major crimes against the federal government, might be worth it.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, anyone who would need to do this is already the type of criminal the GOP loves, so it's win-win!

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago

i don't know whats worse: that this happened, or that i don't know a single person irl who isn't just pretending like nothing happened and everything is going to be fine--even staunchly liberal antitrumpers

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

What are you expecting them to be doing instead? What are you doing differently than them?

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

organize, prepare, contingency planning-- but it's tough for one person acting alone because everyone just doesn't want to think about unpleasant things. so they don't.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This is the key question...

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

The "don't look up" phase

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
481 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19287 readers
2092 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS