384
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/retrogaming@lemmy.world

This was printed in Playboy magazine in April 2001.

It's hard to explain to people who weren't around back then how loose the "rules" were for making games. Conker's Bad Fur Day was definitely trying to market itself as edgy, but aside from some faith-based groups who would be upset, nobody really cared.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] heavy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

+1 basically went through the same mental process.

FWIW, I don't have a problem with adult content on game stores, hell I think we should be more chill about it, but let's call a spade a spade and say what it is. Better yet, separate it into its own category that you can lock or something. Whoever approved it clearly doesn't care.

let’s call a spade a spade and say what it is

I'm not sure how you could get any more explicit and direct than 'real hentai'.

[-] heavy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I mean the fact that it's mixed in with all the other games and not in a T&A section.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
384 points (98.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19900 readers
455 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS