382
submitted 5 days ago by MicroWave@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world

Summary

China has intensified its crackdown on erotic fiction writers, particularly those creating danmei (gay romance/erotica), with over 50 arrests in Anhui province since June 2024.

At least 10 individuals have been sentenced, with penalties reaching up to 4.5 years in prison. Many writers published on Taiwan-based Haitang Literature, which has faced disruption.

Under China's strict laws, earning over 250,000 yuan (~$34,500) from such works can result in a life sentence, though reduced sentences are possible if profits are repaid.

Critics argue the campaign undermines freedom of expression and inflates sales figures to justify harsh punishments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Why would someone bother running against an extremely popular incumbent?

Oh, so you mean he's president for life.

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh, so you mean he’s president for life.

Yeah, in the same way that Franklin D. Roosevelt was, because of his popularity.

I support term limits but this ain't the argument you think it is.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Are you under the bizarre impression that no one ran against FDR? Because otherwise, that's a completely different situation than the "why would anyone bother" one you just presented.

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

FDR exists in a two-party state where two parties must run candidates every single time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1944_United_States_presidential_election

Look at the map... they might as well have not run.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

There is no law saying that any party must run candidates or that there must only be two parties.

Is it that you are intentionally obfuscating or are you really that ignorant about how things work in the American political system?

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There is no law saying that any party must run candidates or that there must only be two parties.

I never said any such law exists. I don't know what point you're making... another candidate in the running that had no chance to win? Should I care that vermin supreme was also running?

What you really need to demonstrate is that the elections in china are rigged/unfair, that's the only way to really move forward in this conversation.

In order to do that you need one of two pieces of information:

  1. How delegates are chosen in china
  2. Proof that ballots are being stuffed/some form of fraud.
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Your words:

FDR exists in a two-party state where two parties must run candidates every single time.

This is false. No party must run candidates.

And now you're claiming you didn't say what you just said, which makes me suspect you're just here to troll.

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is false. No party must run candidates.

I really don't see why this matters at all. I feel like you're trolling me. I didn't mean must under threat, but must under tradition. Why do you care?

What you need to move this conversation forward is one of the following

  1. How delegates are chosen in china, and proof it is unfair
  2. Proof that ballots are being stuffed/some form of fraud.
  3. Evidence that xi is actually unpopular and didn't fairly win the election.

If you can provide none of the previous i don't know why you're talking to me.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yep. You're trolling. Maybe don't do that when you come back tomorrow.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
382 points (96.4% liked)

World News

39504 readers
1791 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS