328
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

There's 0 chance it will be better than their new game (successfully blocked out the title, sorry).

[-] HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Their games are from another time, I feel. They are so focused on how they have always made games and somehow proud of it.

They were great when they were made all those years ago, the times when games felt clunky. It was the times.

But Starfield still has that clunk and other games feel way more fluid these days. I don't feel like I can go back to playing a game that feels like I'm playing a brick.

No preorders, probably won't even end up playing it because it will most likely, probably, definately, suck farts.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

I think Skyrim is when many gamers realized this. The quests in Oblivion were better, and aside from that, it was just more of the same.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

I felt like Morrowind struck a great balance between clunk and depth. Skyrim was polished but had no depth.

Something like Kingdom Come Deliverance feels way more clunky to me, but has far less appeal to general audiences than the Elder Scroll games. Although, there are extremely passionate fans of it, so there's obviously still a market for that kind of game.

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago

The fucked up thing is that no matter how bad and disappointing Starfield was, and no matter how bad and disappointing their subsequent games will be, I’ll still buy and be naively excited for Elder Scrolls VI because Skyrim was such a foundational gaming experience 😩

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 9 points 22 hours ago

Just wait a year or two and it'll be half the price or better

[-] cod@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago
[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 5 points 13 hours ago
[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Gotta love seeing CoD and Doom agreeing on this.

[-] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

Half the price or better and also have a massive modding scene which fixes all the Bethesda jank.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Would you want to play it (and support Bethesda) if it's as bad as Starfield? If yes I won't judge you, but if not it's worth it to wait 1-2 weeks. If it's bad and you still want to play, the seven seas might provide a solution...

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 0 points 18 hours ago

I genuinely don’t know how anyone who played Starfield could willingly give Bethesda more money for another game. I didn’t even get to the procedurally generated part before quitting.

I also only lasted 5 hours in Diablo 4. I normally play very curated high quality games and finish what I start no matter what, so this was a huge shock to me having two unprecedented flops back to back.

tldr fuck gaming I’m touching grass instead

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

A lot of people who played star field didnt pay for it. It was a game pass day one release, which I took to mean they had no hope it would sell well.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

To be fair morrowind was full of clunk, many people were turned off by game mechanics, plus generally forgetting to save before dieing and losing your whole character.

I think the problem is they tried to scale up the production to reach more people, which increases costs. They can't make a unique/interesting/quirky game because they have to sell to a huge amount of people or else its a failure. Morrowind likely didnt have the "market cap" skyrim did, but morrowind is full of creativity and choices.

Morrowind sold 200k copies its first year, and 4 million over its first 4 years while skyrim sold 7 million its first week and 30 million in its first 4 years.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago
[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago
[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

There's 0 chance it'll be better than Starfield

Thought that read pretty clearly honestly

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Sorry. I needed clarification especially since Starfield isn’t very good.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago
[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Actually not a joke, I tried and legitimately couldn't remember. I did remember Shattered Space (since that's a pretty cool name), but not Starfield.

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
328 points (97.7% liked)

Games

17036 readers
1005 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS