593
submitted 15 hours ago by 000@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

Landmark legislation sees the Australian government committed to the novel step of child protection by banning social media for under sixteens.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago

Now kids will be forced to hide being a victim of cyber-bullying from their parents. Great work!

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

If their parents are social media

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

If they don't have an online presence and neither do their peers, how would they be cyber bullied?

I'm sure bullying will go on, old school, in the streets, but cyber bullying is one of the things that will go away with this

I think this is great. There are about one or two generations worth of people that had social media while being kids and I think they should stop acting as if it's the end of the world if it would go away. I fully understand that you grew up with it and don't know any netter but believe you me: you can do without, you can survive without, you will be better without.

Go outside, touch grass, have fun, be a kid again.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If you think this is going to actually stop kids from getting on social media, I have a bridge to sell you.

All it's going to do is push kids to hide their social media apps, which they'll get either through a VPN or faking the ID check, which gives parents even less visibility into what's going on with their children online.

[-] bigschnitz@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

A few years ago the Australian government spent an enormous amount of money on a proposed firewall to protect the children. After years of development they were ready to pilot test their white elephant, and discovered that, on average, the Australian 12 year old could bypass it in ten minutes.

It's unlikely that the government could even enforce an obstacle as robust as the "are you 18+" checkbox that porn sites opt in to. This new law will not have any influence on under 16s online presence.

[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

I'm an Australian, and I don't remember the 'firewall' that you're talking about. Do you have a link or something to remind me?

[-] bigschnitz@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

This is the first result from Google. It's I guess ancient history now being it was the labor rights push to (probably) unintentionally discredit kevin07, but internal politics aside Conroy (famous for his opposition to adult rating for videogames) was for aong time a candidate for 'biggest piece of shit in Australian politics'. Stephen Conroy was the face of it, so search for him and firewall to your hearts content. The Alana and Madeline foundation were involved in some of the testing that damned the project, if I remember right (as if common since hadn't already damned it with seconds of the sales pitch).

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
593 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60352 readers
5172 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS