31
submitted 1 year ago by TheTango@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago

They had an expert on the radio explaining why it's not an issue - the interviewer asked if he'd drink the water and he said yes, but he might be the wrong person to ask, as he's swum in the cooling tanks at Chernobyl.

The Chinese are getting their knickers in twist about it but their nuclear reactors release far more radioactive water into the Pacific and that's all within safe limits. Most of the fuss seems to be political or just arising from ignorance (or both).

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah. And I hate that the media is covering the "controversy" instead of the facts.

[-] FlanFlinger@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Gotta get them clicks!

[-] shellac@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

It may be fine but the issue as I understand it is Japan isn’t being totally transparent about their testing or allowing outside inspection.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

I haven't heard anything about that - the IAEA is happy, as are South Korea and all the experts I've heard speak on the matter. Japan's environment ministry has also been sampling sea water after the release and will give the results on Sunday. Everything seems.to be on working to keep the tritium at levels significantly lower levels than the WHO safe levels (and well below the levels in waste water from other nuclear power plants, including China).

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
31 points (86.0% liked)

News

23655 readers
4680 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS