931

The much maligned "Trusted Computing" idea requires that the party you are supposed to trust deserves to be trusted, and Google is DEFINITELY NOT worthy of being trusted, this is a naked power grab to destroy the open web for Google's ad profits no matter the consequences, this would put heavy surveillance in Google's hands, this would eliminate ad-blocking, this would break any and all accessibility features, this would obliterate any competing platform, this is very much opposed to what the web is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gsus4@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Me installing Linux Mint on a 2022 laptop with a Nvidia GPU (had windows 11 preinstalled, this was an alongside install). I disabled secure boot at first, but still had to go all the way back and set up my MOK keys and turn on secure boot properly with another password to unlock the GPU.

[-] wim@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Pro tip if you want to use Linux: don't rely on non-free drivers.

[-] Gsus4@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not a protip. A protip would be how you do that :D

[-] wim@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Literally buy anything but Nvidia. Intel, AMD have upstream drivers that work regardless of secure boot. Various ARM platforms also have free drivers.

It used to be that there waa only bad choices, now there really is only one bad choice left.

Intel Arc still has some teething problems, particularly with power management on laptops, but AMD has been smooth sailing for almost a decade now.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Please help me understand why this is such a huge issue.

[-] wim@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

For many reasons. Nvidia requiring secure boot in this case, which is not available for all distros or kernels on all computers.

The other is requiring a workable kernel module and user space component from Nvidia, which means that as soon as Nvidia deprecates your hardware, you're stuck with legacy drivers, legacy kernels, or both.

Nvidia also has it's own separate userspace stack, meaning it doesn't integrate with the whole DRM & Mesa stack everyone else uses. For the longest time that meant no Wayland support, and it still means you're limited to Gnome only on wayland when using Nvidia AFAIK.

Another issue is switcheable graphics. Since systems with switchable graphics typically combine a Mesa based driver stack (aka everyone but Nvidia, but typically this would be AMD or Intel integrated graphics) with an Nvidia one, it involves swapping out the entire library chain (OpenGL or Vulkan or whatever libraries). This is typically done by using ugly hacks (wrapper scripts using LD_PRELOAD for example) and are prone to failure. Symptoms can be anything as mild as everything running on the integrated graphics, the discrete graphics never sleeping causing poor battery life or high power consumption, to booting to a black screen all or some of the time.

If these things don't bother you or you have no idea what these things mean, or you don't care about them or your hardware lasting more than 3-5y then it probably isn't a big deal to you. But none of the above exist when using Intel, AMD or a mix of those two.

In my experience the past twenty years, proprietary drivers are the root cause of I would say 90% of my issues using Linux.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

When are people gonna learn to stop buying NVIDIA products?

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I used fedora in 2022 with an Nvidia GPU and used the proprietary drivers just fine. Perhaps there was something different between your system and mine. Newer GPU perhaps? Mine was a 1080.

[-] Gsus4@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

RTX3060, I suspect this is the case for newer laptops, yes.

[-] this_is_router@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Never heard of this before and couldn't find anything about secure boot being required to be enabled to use the Nvidia drivers with Linux.

But since you used dual boot you need to have secure boot enabled anyway, because win 11 would not work without it, would it?

[-] Gsus4@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago
[-] this_is_router@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

This is about signing the driver when secure boot is enabled. It doesn't say that Nvidia won't work with secure boot disabled.

I'm using Nvidia with debian and secure boot disabled btw. So the statement, "Nvidia won't work with secure boot disabled" is still wrong. Might be some Linux mint bug, but not a problem of Nvidia per se

[-] Gsus4@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

fair enough, I had not tested any other distros, my bad.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
931 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37809 readers
244 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS